News
New: A complete overview of the last 24 hours (2006-10-03)
Would you like to see on the monitor at a glance how your website has performed in the last 24 hours?
This is possible with WatchMouse's Performance Chart.
In addition to reports by e-mail and information in the log files, WatchMouse has now introduced the Performance Chart.
This makes for even easier and clearer depiction of the performance of your websites.
The Performance Chart gives a complete overview of the last 24 hours, per rule and with an automatic update. You can therefore see at a glance, in colour, exactly when the website has been slow, unavailable or error-free. The size of the problems is shown in percentage terms.
The Performance Chart can be found under the Reports tab.
URL: http://www.watchmouse.com/performance_chart.php
WatchMouse also offers even more information in the Dashboard. On this status page, you can indicate precisely what graphics and log files you wish to see. Some time ago, the Current Status page underwent a complete make-over. Resulting in this Dashboard. The graphs are renewed independently from one another. You yourself can set an interval, between 1 and 60 minutes. You can select the elements you want and move these to another location on the page. In addition to your own log files, you can show logs and graphics from other accounts to which you have access. The layout and settings are saved in your own account.
In order to put together your own status page, go to the url below and click on ‘add’ at top right to enter the first graph.
URL: http://www.watchmouse.com/status.php
Press releases
FTSE 100 websites suffer from poor performance (2006-04-13)
WatchMouse research shows that 57% of FTSE 100 websites availability is below industry standards
London, April 18, 2006 - Of the 100 companies listed on the FTSE, 57 have websites with poor availability. Many of the sites are badly accessible or unavailable for more than an hour per month.
The worst site, that of United Utilities, is even unavailable for an equivalent of more than 5 days per month.
This was the conclusion drawn from the WatchMouse Site Availability Index for the FTSE 100, created by WatchMouse, a company supplying monitoring services for websites and e-commerce applications worldwide. In order to determine the extent to which the sites of FTSE 100 achieve a satisfactory uptime, WatchMouse monitored the sites continuously between March 2 and April 10, 2006. Every five minutes, one of WatchMouse’s test stations tried to access the homepage of the site, which was expected to download within 8 seconds, without any errors.
An uptime of 99.9% is seen as the minimum acceptable level. This percentage is also often quoted in service level agreements (SLAs) with hosting providers. There were fourteen sites which achieved perfect 100% availability. The availability of the two worst performers was less than 91%; Scottish Power (90.78%) and United Utilities (81.53%).
Mark Pors, chief technology officer at WatchMouse, stated that he was "very surprised" by the results. "With several sites, we found an uptime that was worse than that of many smaller companies. This is worrying as the FTSE companies in particular should give a great deal of priority to their corporate image. Maximum uptime should be part of the overall 'brand performance'."
Pors suspects that for some sites, the popularity could be a reason for poor availability. "Some of the sites belonging to FTSE 100 will get a lot of traffic. However, this is no excuse; if we look at large online brokers in the US, for example, all achieve an uptime in excess of 99.9%."
A complete overview of the monitoring results of the WatchMouse Site Availability Index, listing the 100 sites, can be found on
http://www.watchmouse.com/SPI/2006/FTSE100.php
Spanish websites suffer from poor performance (2005-12-04)
WatchMouse research shows that 71% of IBEX websites availability is below industry standards
MADRID, 20051121 - Of the top 35 funds listed on the Bolsa de Madrid (IBEX), 25 have websites with poor to dramatically poor availability. Many of the sites are badly accessible or unavailable for more than an hour per month.
The worst site, that of Antena 3 TV, is even unavailable for an equivalent of more than 8 days per month.
This was the conclusion drawn from the first Spanish Site Availability Index created by WatchMouse, a company supplying monitoring services for websites and e-commerce applications worldwide. In order to determine the extent to which the sites of IBEX funds achieve a satisfactory uptime, WatchMouse monitored the sites continuously between October 23 and November 11, 2005. Every five minutes, one of WatchMouse’s test stations tried to access the homepage of the site, which was expected to download within 8 seconds, without any errors.
An uptime of 99.9% is seen as the minimum acceptable level. This percentage is also often quoted in service level agreements (SLAs) with hosting providers.
There were only five sites which achieved perfect 100% availability - Sogecable, Arcelor, FCC, BSCH and Altadis. The availability of the three worst performers was less than 95%; Acerinox (94.66%), Gamesa (86.54%) and Antena 3 TV with 73.05%.
Mark Pors, chief technology officer at WatchMouse, stated that he was "very surprised" by the results. "With several sites, we found an uptime that was worse than that of many smaller companies. This is worrying as IBEX funds in particular should give a great deal of priority to their corporate image. Maximum uptime should be part of the overall 'brand performance'."
Pors suspects that for some sites, the popularity could be a reason for poor availability. "Some of the sites belonging to IBEX funds will get a lot of traffic. However, this is no excuse; if we look at large online brokers in the US, for example, all achieve an uptime in excess of 99.9%."
A complete overview of the monitoring results of the WatchMouse Site Availability Index, listing the 35 sites, can be found on http://www.watchmouse.com/en/availabilityindex/2005/IBEX.php
About WatchMouse
Companies can easily monitor their own Internet sites using WatchMouse's monitoring service. WatchMouse has been monitoring Internet sites and e-commerce applications for companies throughout the world since 2002. WatchMouse has thousands of customers in more than 70 countries. The services supplied by WatchMouse are available in eight languages, and analysis are performed from various locations and over numerous networks, using a world-wide monitoring network.
Further information can be found at: www.watchmouse.com
Columns
Why do you need a monitoring service such as Watchmouse? (2005-01-31)
There are a
number of reasons for this, depending on your role in your
organization, and what you want to achieve. Each of these roles leads
to a different approach for using and setting up the
service.
Most likely you are either responsible for keeping a
service such as a website online, or you have contracted somebody
else to do that for you. Additionally, you could be a consultant or
technical architect who wants to get an insight in performance and
uptime characteristics of various solutions and services.
If your
role is to keep things running, you really want to be notified of
problems as soon as possible, before your customers or supervisors
notice. You want appropriate error messages and not too many false
alarms. As you configure Watchmouse you probably want to have a quick
alert by e-mail or SMS/text message when things don't work and have additional
diagnostic information available. In this way, downtime can be kept
to a minimum. It is not only the quality of the systems that counts,
but also the speed with which you can fix problems.
Your role
could also be in overseeing your service providers, whether they are
internal or outsourced. In that case, you don't want to be
interrupted by these messages, unless the situation becomes dramatic.
Instead you would like to look at the weekly report, and see if your
service providers are living up to their promises. On the Internet it
is easy to get 99% uptime, and you should really be doing better than
that. The services that regularly fail to make this grade need
attention, to see if another approach to provisioning them works
better.
If you are considering technical alternatives for the way
you are setting up your e-business, you are most likely interested in
typical failure modes. For example, we know from experience that
most website problems are software problems, followed by sizing
problems. Communications problems are fairly rare, and if they occur
they take the form of peering problems: websites cannot be reached
from specific networks, even if all networks are operational. One
approach using Watchmouse reports is to check various aspects with
different rules. Use one rule to download the homepage, another to
check the DNS and a third to check connectivity to the hosting
centre. In a next column I'll go into the details of this.
Peter van
Eijk is a management consultant specialized in management of
network infrastructures. He can be reached via his
contact page.
Online shops, speed and downtime, getting the facts. (2009-12-07)
These days your website plays an important role in informing potential customers, converting them into customers who want to do business with you, and possibly also conducting the transactions with these customers. In other words: Your business relies ever more on the digital economy, and increasingly on the transactional part of it, the online shop.
These online shops should obviously provide satisfactory performance. Here, both the speed at which they serve pages and their uptime are important. If potential customers cannot reach the online shop, or the online shop is too slow, they are less likely to do business with you now, and in the future. Studies have revealed that half of the people who experience downtime on a website go to its competitor. A majority of online shoppers say performance and uptime influences their choice of online shop.
The amount of revenue that is lost when your website or online shop does not behave properly is hard to quantify. If your website is slow your customers may select a distribution channel that is more costly for you, or they may go to your competitor. Even worse, they may complain about your company to other potential customers. All of this boils down to lost revenue.
A good website is up for at least 99.9% of the time, even though this still represents more than 8 hours in a full year. In a recent survey we found that many websites do not even achieve 99% availability, which corresponds to more than 3 days of downtime a year. As regards speed, if a web page does not load in less than 4 seconds, people start to leave the site, sometimes forever.
How do you make your online shop an efficient experience for your customers? The site must be designed with a strong focus on the customer task. The technology must be no more complex than is relevant. People get annoyed by slow loading Flash intros and complex and slow Flash-based navigation. Take a look at the Google home page; it is one of the fastest websites in the world. On the other hand, you can still use a video clip of a product, if that is relevant to the customer at a particular point in the transaction. You can also use advanced Web 2.0 technology if it makes the user interface more resilient and user-friendly. To experience this, look at Google maps using a dial-up internet connection. It is a really complex user interface, but everything possible has been done to create a positive user experience.
Technology is also important; make sure that you have good service level agreements with all your technology providers. You also want to stress test the site, to see what happens if a lot of people start using it simultaneously. Finally, you should independently monitor the site. When it is time to talk to your hosting company, IT department or website maintainer, it is very helpful to have hard data that reports on the speed and uptime of your online shop.
Peter van Eijk
dr Peter van Eijk is an independent management consultant associated with WatchMouse, the site monitoring experts www.watchmouse.com. He is experienced in setup, management and audits of digital infrastructures. His blog is "Peter's Griddle".
In the press
Linux-based websites 'perform better' (2010-01-13)
Linux-based websites perform better than those hosted on Windows servers, according to research.
WatchMouse, a Dutch firm that monitors server performance, based its research on a survey of over 1,500 European websites. The company says that, although the websites it surveyed were more frequently based on Microsoft's IIS web server platform running Windows than on Apache running Linux, the latter option performed better in terms of both uptime and load time.
